Landscape

Agent Governance: Approaches Compared

Enterprises governing AI agents face a choice between prevention (guardrails), visibility (observability), evidence (proof), and process (manual audit). These are not mutually exclusive. Here is how they compare and where each fits.

The Four Approaches

1. Inference Guardrails

What: Filter model input/output to prevent harmful content.

Strengths: Prevent specific failure modes in real time.

Gaps: No evidence of what actually happened. No tool/side-effect coverage. Mutable rules.

Detailed comparison →

2. Observability Platforms

What: Trace, monitor, and visualize LLM calls and agent behavior.

Strengths: Debugging, cost tracking, performance optimization.

Gaps: Mutable data. Not third-party verifiable. Dashboard is not evidence.

Detailed comparison →

3. Custom Wrappers

What: Team-built interceptors that log API calls and tool invocations.

Strengths: Flexible. Low initial cost. Team-controlled.

Gaps: No standard schema. No signing. High maintenance. Auditors cannot verify independently.

Detailed comparison →

4. Protocol-First Proof (Claw EA)

What: Cryptographic receipts at every enforcement boundary, compiled into signed proof bundles.

Strengths: Offline verification. Tamper-evident. Third-party auditable. Explicit coverage claims.

Gaps: Does not prevent harmful outputs (use guardrails). Does not replace monitoring dashboards (use observability).

Security Review Pack →

When to Use What

RequirementBest approach
Prevent harmful model outputsInference guardrails
Debug agent behavior in real timeObservability
Prove to an auditor what happenedProof bundles (Claw EA)
Enforce policy before executionPolicy-as-code (Claw EA WPC)
Track cost and token usageObservability or receipts
Third-party verificationProof bundles (Claw EA)
Quick prototype loggingCustom wrappers
Compliance evidence (SOC 2, SOX)Proof bundles + automated collection

The Protocol Advantage

Most governance tools are products: closed platforms with proprietary formats. Claw EA is built on a protocol: five open primitives (WPC, CST, Receipt, Bundle, Verifier) with published schemas and a reference verifier. This means your evidence is not locked to a vendor. If you stop using Claw EA tomorrow, your proof bundles still verify.

See how this maps to your environment

Take the two-minute assessment. We map controls, receipts, and proof requirements to your stack.

Take the assessment Security Review Pack